Richard Vail

Obama's Campaign Promise of Transparency



Posted: Tuesday, January 05, 2010

by Richard Vail
Chisel & Plane

When he was campaigning last year, Mr. Obama swore that C-SPAN would have access to all Congressional meetings that his administration was concerned with. Mr. Obama the candidate said, "We'll have the negotiations televised on C-SPAN, so that people can see who is making arguments on behalf of their constituents, and who are making arguments on behalf of the drug companies or the insurance companies."

That was then this is now. C-SPAN is being denied access to the Reconciliation process between the House and the Senate this month. The New Republic is reporting that the Democratic leadership in both houses have decided to bypass the conference committee process in order to avoid having to televise those meetings on C-SPAN.

According to a pair of senior Capitol Hill staffers, one from each chamber, House and Senate Democrats are "almost certain" to negotiate informally rather than convene a formal conference committee. Doing so would allow Democrats to avoid a series of procedural steps--not least among them, a series of special motions in the Senate, each requiring a vote with full debate--that Republicans could use to stall deliberations, just as they did in November and December. "There will almost certainly be full negotiations but no formal conference," the House staffer says. "There are too many procedural hurdles to go the formal conference route in the Senate." [moreover] "I think the Republicans have made our decision for us," the Senate staffer says. "It's time for a little ping-pong." "Ping pong" is a reference to one way the House and Senate could proceed. With ping-ponging, the chambers send legislation back and forth to one another until they finally have an agreed-upon version of the bill.

Yet C-SPAN CEO Brian Lamb argues [via motherjones dot com ]: "President Obama, Senate and House leaders, many of your rank-and-file members, and the nation's editorial pages have all talked about the value of transparent discussions on reforming the nation's health care system. Now that the process moves to the critical stage of reconciliation between the Chambers, we respectfully request that you allow the public full access, through television, to legislation that will affect the lives of every single American."

Mr. Lamb makes a valid point, but he can't expect Mr. Obama to lean on Democrats in Congress to give C-SPAN permission to broadcast. Just last year, during a press conference in July, Mr. Obama was asked about his specific campaign pledge: Question: "You promised that health care negotiations would take place on C-SPAN and that hasn't happened....Are you fulfilling your promise of transparency in the White House?" Mr. Obama replied, "With respect to all the negotiations not being on C-SPAN, you will recall in this very room that our kick-off event was here on C-SPAN. And at a certain point, you know, you start getting into all kinds of different meetings. The Senate Finance Committee is having a meeting. The House is having a meeting. If they want those to be on C-SPAN, then I would welcome it. I don't think there are a lot of secrets going on in there."

Mr. Lamb is absolutely correct to demand that Congress show us, the citizens of the United States, exactly how this vitally important bill is being finalized. After all, this is literally the government taking over one sixth of the economy. Besides, we can't have the proles (us, the people who will foot the bill), getting a look into how things are really done by Congress, now can we? Yet another campaign promise goes by the boards. Obama lied, America pays, and pays and will pay for decades to come.

If Ms. Pelosi and Mr. Reid do succeed in shutting out the GOP from the reconciliation process, then the Democratic Party will not just own this disastrous bill, but they will hang this millstone around the necks of your children's children, children...

Rich, a veteran of the USMC, grew up in NW Florida (aka LA-lower Alabama), has lived all over the eastern US...before finally in Maryland in 2004.  Rich writes and edits www.thevailspot.blogspot.com. Take a look at his blog for more articles.
This Article has been viewed 228 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
Top-level comments on this article: (3 total)
» left by Marijo Phelps
2 years 116 days ago.
142 fans.
Well written and, I feel, full of truth! Marijo
» left by Richard Vail 2 years 116 days ago.
60 fans.
Thanks, Marijo.
» left by Olufemi Ladeinde
2 years 115 days ago.
9 fans. Follow Olufemi Ladeinde on twitter!
This has only shown that politics is the art of the "deliverable". It was easy for Barak Obama to promise transparency, but to deliver the promise requires the cooperation of members of congress which they are not about to give!
» left by Richard Vail 2 years 115 days ago.
60 fans.
Indeed it does...a politician who promised much and has delivered nothing but bribes, huge spending increases and programs we can't afford...but it's "fair"...NOT...thanks for your comments, Olufemi.
» left by Melanie
from USA
1 year 354 days ago.
Wow very compelling and we should be very worried about allowing the continuation of doing the people's work in darken places and those who practice to decieve well they weave one tangled web purposefully.
» left by Richard Vail 1 year 329 days ago.
60 fans.
Melanie, Thanks for your comments. Hit my blog (link in my bio) and feel free to comment regularly.
 
Rich
We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.